After the Council: Living Vatican II
The Second Vatican Council: Why Would Pope John XXIII Weep
What's Your Opinion?
La Casa di Mo
In Associated Press interviews with more than 75 such politicians, none said that they are abstaining from the sacrament over the issue, and many said they believed voting for legalized abortion did not jeopardize their standing with the church.
"I am very comfortable with my status, and quite frankly, my relationship with God is direct and personal and the church is merely a guest in that relationship," said U.S. Rep. James Langevin, a Democrat from Rhode Island, the state with the nation's highest percentage of Catholics.
Source
The renunciation (of marriage for the sake of the kingdom) is possible only when one admits an authentic knowledge of the value that is contained by the nuptial disposition of masculinity and femininity to marriage. In order for man to be fully aware of what he is choosing (continence for the dake of the kingdom) he must also be fully aware of what he is renouncing.Not to toot my own horn or anything, but I tried to make the same point also here.
And so we have it. It wasn't noble Christian British knights who sat around Arthur's round table and forged the legendary Camelot. It was the combined ingenuity of pagan Woad face-painters and Central Asian cavalrymen. It was not a refined queen who embodied the ideal medieval Lady, but an arrow-slinging Goth chick. And for good measure, don't forget, it was the technologically advanced barbarians who brought sophisticated artillery into battle, not the Romans. I'm sure glad that Hollywood has set the record straight. I was worried we were being fed a bunch of rubbish.
If you've seen the movie, please comment.
In World War I Emperor Charles of Austria, King of Hungary, tried desperately to end the bloodshed with a constructive peace. Many are the reasons why he could not succeed. It staggers the imagination if one considers what would have happened had this man of peace been successful in his endeavors.
The principles for which he stood are still valid in our day. After his death he was considered by many an unlucky ruler, a marginal figure of history. Nowadays, more than a half century after his death, judgement concerning him is changing, particiluarly in the light of what happened after the First World War and especially of Yalta and its consequences.
In this sense historians have been turning their attention to him and to his spouse Empress and Queen Zita. Many of the lies which were told concerning them have been proven to be false. This is important, since the present generation has the task to rebuild a European Community, the fulfillment of the ideals for which Emperor Charles had stood.
"I am inviting all baptized Catholics who feel injured by Kerry to join the suit as third parties" by reading the document on the Web site and then sending a certified letter of agreement to the Boston Archdiocese.